My post entitled, "This Side of 313," got linked to another site where I found an interesting discussion on Brian McLaren. He is not a stranger to controversy, often charged with religious sycretism. The following is a classic example....
What if the Emergent Church crowd could re-write some of the “mean” parts of the Bible? What would it look like? The following is an account from the story of Elijah & the prophets of Baal. Much of the narrative is from actual things Brian McLaren has written in his books (McLaren is one of the main advocates of the “emergents”).
Elijah said to Ahab, “You have forsaken the commandments of the Lord, and you have followed Baal. Although I don’t agree with that decision, I can’t condemn it. After all, no one has all the truth. I understand that Israel has some truth and so does the religion of Baal. We’re all seekers of ultimate truth. Therefore, let us unite with the prophets of Baal. Now then send and gather to me all Israel at Mount Carmel, together with 450 prophets of Baal and 400 prophets of the Asherah, who eat at Jezebel’s table. And let us all have a conversation” (I Kings 18:18-19).
So Ahab sent a message among all the sons of Israel, and brought the prophets together at Mount Carmel. And Elijah came near to all the people and said, “How long will we hesitate between two opinions? Forever, I say! The Lord might be God, or Baal might be God. We all have our own personal opinion as to who God is, but let’s face it: We might be wrong. So let us be open to Baal. Remember, Judge not lest ye be judged!” But the people did not answer him a word (I Kings 18:20-21).
Then Elijah said to the people, “I alone am left a prophet of the Lord, but Baal’s prophets are 450 men. I’m not saying this proves that Baal is the true God, but it is a powerful argument for Baal, wouldn’t you agree? So let’s be open to what the prophets of Baal have to teach us.” (I Kings 18:22).
“Now —- it, I know that some of you have proposed that we put Baal to the test and see if either Baal or Yahweh will give us a sign from heaven. But this is wrong. Even if fire came down from heaven, that wouldn’t prove anything. If we thought that fire proved that Yahweh was the true God, we would be arrogant. Our certainty would be based on evidence that could easily be explained by natural phenomenon. So instead of having the arrogance of certainty, let us instead have a humble conversation and unite in the unity of love with the prophets of Baal.” And all the people answered Elijah and said, “That is a good idea” (I Kings 18:23-24).
So Elijah said to the prophets of Baal, “We respect your beliefs, prophets of Baal. We Israelites do not have absolute certainty about the God of Israel. In truth, we might be wrong. We’re only relatively certain that we’re onto something when we worship Yahweh. Therefore we don’t judge you when you call out to Baal or when you cut yourselves with swords and lances until blood gushes out. Additionally, we don’t believe that Yahweh is at war with Baal. God has not called his followers to gain victory or to triumph over his enemies. Yahweh does not want us to conquer the hearts of men through evangelism. “Conquest” is a trait of evil, white, European, male Christianity. We’re above and beyond such mean-spirited hurtfulness” (I Kings 18:25-29).
Then Elijah said to all the people, “Come near to me.” So all the people came near to him. And he repaired the altar of the Lord, which had been torn down. And Elijah took the same number stones as there are world religions, and he said, “To the prophets of Baal and to all sincere worshipers of deities, we unite with you in true love and unity. The lion is lying down with the lamb. Amen?” (I Kings 18:30-39).
Then Elijah said to the people, “Shake hands with the prophets of Baal. Hug them as your spiritual brothers”. So they hugged them; and Elijah brought them down to the brook Kishon, and made them members of his church. (I Kings 18:40).
My response:
I don't think this passage is concerned with interfaith relationships. In this narrative we clearly see Elijah taking a stand against the dominant power of the day - a system that countered everything that God's people were supposed to be. McLaren affirms opposing such powers. Is it possible that systems antithetical to Kingdom values even wear the name "Christian" at times (i.e. the medieval crusades, 20th century colonialism)? If the point of the story is that Elijah condemned the people who worshiped Baal, then why was he sent to live with a mother and son in Zarephath in the previous chapter? Elijah became dependent on a poor and powerless widow - a woman that represented and lived in the heart of the very “godless” nation that now stood forcefully against Yahweh. We have many similar stories of God’s messengers befriending people of other faiths in the old and new testaments.
The alternate (more literal?) message of this text could be, kill the evil infidels in the name of God. I’m not sure this is appropriate, though this fundamentalist cry has become louder and louder in both the east and the west in the last decade.
I tracked the original post down to a surprising website. The moderator of the blog is Steve Camp (yes, the same Steve Camp that I listened to as one of the only Christian artists in the 1970s!) Steve's first album in 1978 was, Saying it with Love. Interesting title.... Click here for some extremely anti-McLaren reactions.
What is your response?
I often feel deeply saddened (occasionally amused and angry) when I see commentary in which the apparent interest is to malign another brother or sister without any effort to hold a real dialogue or put anything much more than a knee-jerk kind of thinking into these one-sided responses. But it is nothing new, and McLaren and others like him are not necessarily intended victims but the people who happened to get in the way of a comfortable system. Church history is filled with poor saps deemed heretics who later became saints and role models for the subsequent church. They stirred up fear, anxiety, and other negative emotions that are more easily pushed under the carpet than dealt with honestly.
I wish it were possible for these critics to hold authentic dialogue and relationship with those whom they disagree. But in order to do that, they would need to learn not just a number of skills but how to become different kind of people. Tall order. Those of us who can must continue to model this if there is any hope for genuine conversation in the future. And those of us who are not so good at this must dedicate ourselves to learning to become the kind of people who listen with ears and hearts.
Posted by: Linda | March 20, 2006 at 06:56 AM