I’m stunned at how many Christians think they’re electing Jesus on November 4. I’m getting pretty tired of being phoned, emailed, spammed, FaceBooked and in other ways accosted by well-meaning believers who have completely come to find their identity in a political candidate or proposition.
There are at least two major issues that Christians are divided on this time around: the presidential election and, in California, Proposition 8. It’s times like these that bring out the most irrational thinking and the sloppiest hermeneutics. It’s time for a reality check: all campaigns lie, make unfounded accusations and spread disinformation. Depending on who you talk to, McCain and Obama can each be viewed as the Antichrist (no such character found in scripture by the way) or the Savior. And I love the way each side paints their candidate as “the” Christian in the race. In addition, one candidate is “guilty by association,” another for having too many addresses and another for dressing sharp.
Prop 8 raises a whole other set of issues. This is the attempt to modify the California constitution to define marriage as limited to one man and one woman. The “yes” folks warn we will get “gay education” if it’s not passed, and the “no” population learns to hate the church with a new vigor. “This” church invokes biblical authority, "that" church opens their arms with Christ’s love.
As I said above, I see two primary flaws in the way many Christians approach elections. First, there’s a sense of irrationality. Say goodbye to any kind of an intelligent conversation; pick a side and call the other whackos and lunatics. “Oh, they’re well-meaning,” we say, “they just don’t have any brains (AND they’re ruining the country!). A recent psych study at Cornell University verifies the human propensity toward an “unshakeable self-confidence in one’s decisions” and the myth of “the feeling of being right.” The problem with convictions, gut feelings, and hunches is that we rely exclusively on these intuitions at the expense of logical conversation. Hence, a debate is an opportunity to bolster what one already believes (cyclical reasoning) rather than a chance to expand ones understanding and knowledge.
"Feelings of absolute certainty and utter conviction are not rational deliberate conclusions; they are involuntary mental sensations generated by the brain. Like other powerful mental states such as love, anger and fear, they are extraordinarily difficult to dislodge through rational arguments. Just as it's nearly impossible to reason with someone who's enraged and combative, refuting or diminishing one's sense of certainty is extraordinarily difficult. Certainty is neither created by nor dispelled by reason.”
A second flaw in our approach to elections is that of prooftexting. Christians taking ANY position, be it on a presidential candidate or a proposition, can find support for their position in scripture. James Dobson does this. The Reverend Jeremiah Wright does as well. Cult leaders do it best.
Prooftexting is the practice of selecting verses out of scripture that support what one already believes, regardless of the context they were originally written for. A classic example: we often hear the verse, “where two or three are gathered in my name, there am I in their midst” and apply it to the topic of prayer. If we read the whole chapter of Matthew 18 however, we don’t hear a word about prayer. The chapter is entirely about conflict and forgiveness. The implication: When two or three come together to reconcile and forgive, there am I in their midst. Go ahead, read it.
Because so many Christians are prone to irrationality and prooftexting, they vilify one candidate and praise another. Obama is a kills babies. McCain kills Iraqis. And there is very little ground in between for conversation. Families are divided, friendships are strained and congregations stand against one another, always in the “name of Jesus.”
Maybe that’s the gist of the problem – we keep claiming the name of Jesus in ways that are inappropriate. I’m lucky, my wife and I cancel two or three of each other’s votes on candidates and ballot propositions every election. We see issues differently; sometimes we agree, sometimes we don’t. That doesn’t make either one of us less Christian. Just because she voted different than me doesn’t mean she’s dumb or unholy. (Although I often remind her that I am smarter than her – after all, when we got married look what she got and look what I got!)
So let’s find our identity in Christ, not in politicians or political causes. If the Jews and Gentiles could do it, Dems and Reps might just have a chance.
In the end, we’re not electing Jesus. If we did, I’m sure he’d just get crucified.
The NFC pastoral staff at our Halloween carnival:
Loren "Biden" Dubberke, Terron "Obama" Nolan, James "McCain" Bergen, Krystal "Palin" Klaassen
You are so right on the money!!!
Just because your of one party or another doesn't make you love for God any less, And God loves everybody even Presidental Candidate's!! A vote for one isn't a vote against Jesus! But because of all the controversy I refuse to vote for a person. I will vote on issues but not for people.
I pay my taxes and I love my lord I think thats all jesus asks me to do.
The rest of you can fight about what person is right or wrong because in the end.
GOD will still be in Control! Jesus will still have died for all sinners!
Prayer is still the best peace maker! and Loving each other the best way to be!!
So on election day just remember who is really in Control and Large and in Charge!! MY SAVIOR AND YOURS WHETHER YOU HAVE MET HIM Yet OR NOT
JESUS CHRIST!!!!!
lOVE Lizzie
Posted by: Lizz Tapscott | November 03, 2008 at 04:20 PM
Thanks for the comment Liz. I vote in elections and I think it's important to do so, but the kingdom of Obama or McCain is not the same as the Kingdom of Christ. That's the one I'm living for.
-Tim
Posted by: Tim Neufeld | November 03, 2008 at 05:35 PM
Thanks Tim.
Posted by: Jeff Zimm | November 03, 2008 at 05:43 PM
I truly appreciate this post. This presidential election has been a difficult one for me. I have been a reluctant participant in the past and this time around I am going to stand as a conscientious objector to the presidential election. I just wrote a post about this on my blog (ecumenicalpilgrim.blogspot.com).
I do believe that participation in voting is important for Christians.
I just can't do it this year.
I just can't do it for these candidates.
Shalom
Posted by: Scott Peterson | November 03, 2008 at 06:15 PM
I agree Scott, this has been a difficult election to process. I keep wondering if it's the nature of the campaigns, the change in North American culture, or maybe I'm just in a different place since the last "real" election eight years ago. Being "CO" is something I'm familar with; that's an interesting connection you make with it to the election. Thanks for the comment.
-Tim
Posted by: Tim Neufeld | November 03, 2008 at 06:32 PM
Thank you.
Posted by: Linda Bryant | November 03, 2008 at 08:25 PM
Thanks for the post. I am glad this particular election is coming to a close, the phone calls and e-mails. I have, however, been encouraged by the discussions our college group has had over the past few weeks over propositions and candidates. There has been intelligent, gracious, and open conversation to understand opposite viewpoints and to become well-informed voters (ask Aaron and Christa about it sometime)! I was also encouraged the other day as I caught the tail end of a chat with Sarah Palin on Focus on the Family. I have NOT wanted to listen to that broadcast recently (for a lot of the reasons you mention above), but caught a blip with James Dobson saying he was praying for her (Palin) and McCain and their respective families and asking God for a miracle...to turn this election around in their favor. She graciously thanked him for his prayers, but firmly stated right after that she believes that whatever the outcome of the election, she will stand behind the people's choice, she believes that God can work through that person, and that we as God's people should not ridicule or "bash" the opposing candidates if they are chosen for office. I was amazed! It's not that she was giving up or endorsing the other side. She was, in a way, taking a "time out" from her politics, to be a Christian, a believer that views God as sovereign and will do her part no matter who is voted into office. As an Obama supporter, I was tempted for a bit to vote the other way. I hope that all those listening took her words to heart. I agreed whole-heartedly with her on that particular issue.
Posted by: Jamie Mack | November 04, 2008 at 11:54 AM
Right on, bro! Although I voted for a candidate today, I didn't vote with the idea that the winner would bring the Kingdom of God on earth. It seems to me that when it comes right down to it, that is what the Christian Right and the Christian Left are saying: that the right candidate will bring the Kingdom. Or maybe it is just as you said earlier: that if we vote for the "wrong" candidate, we will usher in the Antichrist and his kingdom. Bah!
Whoever gets elected has a tough job ahead of him and will probably come out smelling like the manure fertilizing the roses rather than the roses themselves!
Posted by: Linda | November 04, 2008 at 03:56 PM
Tim,
Thanks for the insightful and intelligent thoughts. They are refreshing and needed. I find myself sometimes discouraged because it seems that we are finding more and more reasons to be divided with one another instead of joining together as the united body of Christ. I can't seem to stop thinking about Jesus' prayer in John 17 where he pleads with the Father that we his followers would be unified because it will be our unity that will be a witness of what God is like. This will not be an easy task, but typically the way of great significance and importance comes at a great cost. My prayer for Christians on both the right and the left is that we would find our unity in the mission of Christ. A mission that is all about freedom, redemption and restoration, and a mission we are all invited to take part in.
Love & peace
Matt
Posted by: Matthew Ford | November 05, 2008 at 08:45 PM
Thank you, Tim. I was so saddened each time I drove past the Riverpark area and saw two corners full of Pro Prop 8 people and two corners with No on Prop 8 people. They were standing there, yelling at cars and holding their signs, but no one was talking to the other side. Is that what Christ would do? Wouldn't he have at least met and listened to the people on the other side? Do we really think that yelling our own opinions will help change someone else's? I appreciate your comments on this election.
Posted by: Christa Wiens | November 06, 2008 at 02:24 PM
Tim, Man! Your last few posts have been refreshing and provacative. My wife and I have been having these same conversations at home - materialism, greed, economic gluttony, Elections, Prop 8, etc. Concerning this post and the elections, I cringed when they showed the local pastor on TV blaming Prop 8 vote No activists for the damage to his church and the tone of hate and divisiveness that I felt he perpetuated. The wife and I have been talking alot about how hateful Christians can be. Name calling, in people's faces, etc. Sometimes it feels like the Christian right is really the Christain self RIGHTeous. (Pharisees?) The hateful words/tone and name calling are not going to compel a gay person to want to recieve Christ or believe God is a God of love. I don't recall Jesus being so involved in politics and aligning himself with the Christian right. Seems he was hanging with the down and out, fringe. Our children are getting older and it has been a real challenge and opportunity to teach them through these elections in the wake of comments at church, school, TV, and social circles. We have tried to instill in them the same attitude Palin had, amazingly, on Dobson gig. (I have to believe this took the wind from his sail.) We believe, like Palin stated, however the election pans out, we will support our leader and do our part to make the world a better place with our daily, conscientious choices. (Duh! I hate it when we as christains limit God.) God can work through whoever is in office - he is in control and always right on time. We are teaching our children that christians should not ridicule or "bash" the opposing candidates if they are chosen for office. We should trust God and live as Jesus did. You mention proof texting. Spot on dude. I just finsihed Pagan Christiantiy by Barna and Viola. Lots of conversation in this read about proof texting and how it is used in a self serving way. Thank you for your candor and challenging words. Rock on Timbro!
Posted by: Spaceman Spiff | November 07, 2008 at 11:27 AM
Mr. Neufeld, I like the title. This election really shook things up for many. An example would be when a few well known men of God that come out on television wanted to endorse McCain, but he wound up rejecting them. Before and after the elections I had discussions with some brothers in Christ regarding Prop 8. They argued that if prop 8 passed, everything would go downhill. My response was, if your Christianity cannot survive in a land where gay people can marry, you got a serious problem. The early Church of Yeshua was able to do more than survive in a perverse Roman Empire, and under "real" persecution. They werent trying to change the laws of the land, because they were busy winning souls. Maybe we should look to them as the example, and work on winniing souls for Christ, because politicians cannot.
Posted by: Ivan Garcia | November 22, 2008 at 06:18 PM
Hey Tim-
This was a great read. I wish more believers felt this way. Elections are tough to deal with. I think that we so badly want to bring Christ into elections, but He doesn't fit into a mold like that. God is not "human", and certainly not in the form of Obama or McCain.
I hate that this divides us as brothers and sisters in Christ. I can only pray that God will soften their hearts, and let them realize there is waaaay more to life than who is president. Our Father promises to take care of us and really, that's the most important thing to me!
I also had to comment on this post because of the hysterical Halloween picture. Too much to handle! haha.
Posted by: Brandy McCann | February 21, 2009 at 12:35 AM